Custody and Visitation
The family law team at Meriwether & Tharp LLC encourages the parties to work together towards a mutually agreeable custody and visitation schedule that provides liberal visitation in the best interest of the children. If the parties are at a point of disagreement, rather than rushing to the judge, we often involve experienced mediators to assist the parties with working towards an agreement that is both a win for each parent and most importantly, a win for the children who are caught in the middle of the dispute. Disputes over custody and visitation can often be the most expensive part of a divorce because emotions tend to drive the parties to the Court, often driving up legal expenses.
In cases where the parties are disputing custody, frequently a Guardian ad Litem (typically an attorney) is appointed by the judge to represent the interests of the children in the action. A Guardian will give a recommendation to the court as to what would be in the “best interest of the children” in regards to a custody and visitation arrangement. In certain situations, a custody evaluator can be appointed to develop an expert opinion as to which parent would be the best primary custodian for the children.
Contact the Atlanta family law attorneys of Meriwether & Tharp at (678) 879-9000 or email us at familylaw@mtlawoffice.com regarding all your child custody needs and visitation rights.
Atlanta Divorce Attorney Blog - Child Custody
- How to handle post-divorce custody issues in Georgia Georgia family law attorneys often deal with post-divorce custody issues. For example, sometimes, unfortunately, a parent refuses to return a child at ....
- Custody awarded to father in Georgia divorce case despite evidence of alleged family violence The Supreme Court of Georgia recently affirmed a divorce action where the husband was awarded primary physical custody of the children despite ....
- In Georgia, trial court cannot rely on evidence from temporary hearing in making final judgment The Supreme Court of Georgia recently reversed a trial court’s decision in a custody modification case because the trial court erroneously ....